Skip to content
JapanInvestmentAICross-Border BusinessMarket EntryStrategy

683 Companies Out: Japan's Biggest Topix Shake-Up Since 1969 Opens a Door for Foreign Partners — and This Week's AI Models Make the Homework Cheap

Medusa Japan
12 min read
Share

Key Takeaways

  1. 1On October 7 Japan Exchange Group announced that 683 companies will leave the Topix and 35 will join, shrinking it from 1,636 to 986 stocks. Inclusion now depends on trading turnover and free-float market value, not on whether a company is listed on the Prime market.
  2. 2Removal is gradual: weights are cut in eight quarterly steps from October 30, 2026 to July 2028. Companies that meet the rules at the October 2027 review stop the process. From October 2028 the index is rebalanced every year.
  3. 3Many of the 683 are not weak businesses. They are thinly traded, often because cross-shareholdings, a parent company or a founding family hold most of the shares. They now have twelve months to raise free float, grow, merge or go private — and each path can involve an outside partner.
  4. 4On October 7 OpenAI began rolling out GPT-6 in ChatGPT and Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens. By our estimate, a first-pass AI read of the main filings of all 683 companies now costs less than $10 in model fees.
  5. 5For foreign companies the practical move is a 90-day screen: pull the JPX list, filter by sector, read each target's cost-of-capital disclosure and mid-term plan, and approach the best five with a proposal that helps them pass the October 2027 test.

What the Exchange Announced

The Topix is Japan's broadest major stock index. For most of its life it simply held almost every company on the Tokyo Stock Exchange's old First Section, at one point about 2,200 of them. On Wednesday, October 7, Japan Exchange Group (JPX) published the results of its new rules, and Bloomberg called it the biggest reshuffle since the index started in 1969. 683 companies will be phased out and 35 will be added, so the index falls from 1,636 stocks to 986, a cut of about 40%. Additions include McDonald's Holdings Japan, the workwear retailer Workman, the taxi-app operator GO and the semiconductor-materials maker Ferrotec. Removals include well-known names such as the staffing group Pasona.

Two numbers now decide whether a company is in the index. The first is the annual trading value turnover ratio, which shows how actively the shares change hands. The second is free-float market capitalization: the value of the shares that can actually be traded, after excluding blocks held by parents, partners and founders. A stock must rank within roughly the top 97% of total free-float market value and meet the turnover test. Just as important, index membership is now separate from the market segment. A Prime-listed company that fails the tests is out; a Standard or Growth company that passes them is in.

The change is slow by design. Weights of the removed companies are cut in eight quarterly steps, starting October 30, 2026 and ending in July 2028. A company that meets the rules at the reassessment in October 2027 stops the process. From October 2028 the index will be reviewed every year, so no company can count on staying in by default. The money involved is large: Daiwa Securities estimated in September that about ¥166 trillion (around $1.1 trillion) in passive funds tracks the Topix, including the Government Pension Investment Fund. Foreign investors were already repositioning: in the week to October 2 they sold a record ¥2.24 trillion of Japanese equity futures while buying a net ¥956 billion of cash shares.

Why the 683 Are Not a Discount Bin

It is tempting to read the list as a list of losers. That would be a mistake. The new tests measure how much of a company the market can trade, not how good the company is. Many of the 683 are profitable, mid-sized manufacturers, distributors and service firms whose shares rarely trade because most of them sit with a parent company, a group of banks and business partners holding cross-shareholdings, or a founding family. JPX itself says the sector mix and valuation of the index barely change after the reform. In plain terms, the exchange did not remove bad companies; it removed companies that the public market cannot easily own.

That creates a clock. A company that wants to stay in the index has until the October 2027 review to raise its free float and its trading volume. The usual levers all change who owns the company. Unwinding cross-shareholdings puts blocks of shares up for sale, and someone has to buy them. A parent can sell down a listed subsidiary. A family can bring in a strategic investor. A company can also decide that the listing is no longer worth it: management buyouts and take-privates were already running at record levels before this week. Japan logged 4,086 domestic M&A deals in 2025, an all-time high, worth ¥11.2 trillion. Inbound deals by foreign buyers rose to 372, worth ¥6.2 trillion, and private-equity investment in Japan more than doubled to a record $51.8 billion.

For a foreign company, the important point is that the pressure is not only about the stock. A board that must explain to shareholders how it will grow, raise return on equity and justify its listing is a board that is open to new distribution channels, joint ventures, licensing deals and minority investors. Since 2023 the Tokyo Stock Exchange has asked listed companies to publish plans for management that is conscious of the cost of capital and the share price. Many of the 683 have published such plans with promises they have not yet kept. A credible foreign partner that brings new revenue outside Japan is exactly the kind of story those plans need.

This Week's AI Models Make the Homework Cheap

The hard part of finding a Japanese partner has never been the list. It has been reading. Each of the 683 companies files an annual securities report (yuho) of often more than a hundred pages, a mid-term plan, a corporate-governance report and, in many cases, a cost-of-capital disclosure. Most of it is only in Japanese. Until recently, a foreign company screening a few hundred candidates needed a team of bilingual analysts for weeks. Two launches on the same day as the Topix announcement change that math.

On October 7, OpenAI began rolling out GPT-6 in ChatGPT, with GPT-6 Sol for Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise users and GPT-6 Luna for Free and Go users from October 8. It comes with Intelligent UI, which can answer with charts, tables, forms and buttons inside the chat instead of plain text. That is useful when you want to compare twenty companies side by side. The same day Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, a small model built for high-volume work, at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts under 100,000 tokens — about a tenth of Haiku 4.5's standard rate.

Here is our rough estimate. If you extract the key sections of each company's filings — business overview, segment results, shareholder structure, cross-shareholdings and the cost-of-capital plan — you get roughly 80,000 tokens per company. Reading all 683 then means about 55 million input tokens, or around $5.50 with Haiku 5.5, plus well under $1 for a structured two-page summary of each. Even allowing for retries and a second pass with a stronger model on your top 50, the model bill stays below the cost of one hour of a bilingual analyst. Two cautions apply. First, check every number that will drive a decision against the original filing on EDINET, the Financial Services Agency's disclosure site; models still misread tables. Second, keep any material received under a non-disclosure agreement out of consumer chat tiers and use a business or API account with data-retention controls.

A 90-Day Plan for Foreign Companies

Days 1 to 30: build the long list. Download the JPX list of companies scheduled for removal and filter it by the sectors where you sell, buy or build. For each company, have an AI model pull five facts from its filings: what it sells and where, its share of overseas revenue, who holds its largest blocks of shares, what it promised in its cost-of-capital plan, and whether that promise is on track. Then have a person who reads Japanese check the top 30. You will usually find that a handful of companies have a strong product, weak international sales and a plan that names overseas growth as a goal. Those are your targets.

Days 31 to 60: design the offer. A Japanese board facing the October 2027 review wants something it can show shareholders within a year. Depending on your size, that can be a distribution agreement that puts their product into your European or American channel, a joint venture for a new product line, a technology licence, or a minority stake that buys part of a cross-shareholding block and so raises free float. Write the proposal in Japanese, show the numbers in yen, and link your offer directly to the targets in their own published plan. A proposal that quotes a company's own mid-term plan back to it is read very differently from a generic pitch.

Days 61 to 90: make the approach the Japanese way. Cold emails to investor-relations inboxes rarely work. An introduction through the company's main bank, a trading house, a regional chamber of commerce or an adviser who knows the board is far more effective, and the first meeting should be about mutual understanding, not terms. Expect nemawashi — quiet consensus-building inside the company — to take months, which is why starting now matters: the companies that act early will have chosen their partners well before the 2027 review. This is the work we do at Medusa Japan from Osaka: bilingual screening, Japanese-language proposals and introductions that open the right doors on both sides.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Topix, and why does leaving it matter to a company?

The Topix (Tokyo Stock Price Index) is Japan's broadest major stock index, run by Japan Exchange Group. Roughly ¥160 trillion in index funds, ETFs and pension money, including Japan's Government Pension Investment Fund, buys its members automatically. A company that leaves the index loses that steady demand for its shares, which can weigh on its share price and liquidity, and it loses some visibility with domestic and foreign investors. Under the new rules, the 683 removed companies lose weight gradually between October 2026 and July 2028, and they can stop the process by meeting the rules at the October 2027 review.

Does being removed from the Topix mean a company is in trouble?

Not necessarily. The tests measure free-float market value and trading turnover, not profitability or product quality. Many removed companies are healthy mid-sized businesses whose shares are mostly held by a parent, by banks and partners through cross-shareholdings, or by a founding family, so little stock trades. Some removed companies do have weak growth, which is why each candidate needs its own review. But as a group, the 683 are better described as under-traded than as under-performing.

We are a mid-sized foreign company, not a buyout fund. How can we use this?

Most of the opportunity is commercial, not financial. A removed company needs a growth story it can show shareholders before the October 2027 review, and many have overseas expansion in their mid-term plans without a channel to deliver it. A distribution agreement, a co-developed product, a licence or a joint venture with a foreign partner can provide that story without anyone buying the whole company. If you have the means, a small minority stake bought from a cross-shareholding block can also help them raise free float and give you a seat at the table.

Can AI models really read Japanese securities filings reliably?

Well enough for screening, not well enough for signing. Current models read Japanese business prose fluently and are good at pulling out shareholders, segments and stated targets. They still make mistakes with dense tables, units (millions versus thousands of yen) and footnotes. Use AI to narrow 683 companies down to 30, then have a Japanese reader check every figure that matters against the original filing on EDINET before you approach anyone. Before signing anything, professional due diligence by Japanese-qualified advisers remains essential.

Ready to Transform Your Brand?

Medusa Japan combines AI innovation with Japanese design principles to create extraordinary digital experiences.

Get in Touch

How ready is your business for Japan?

Take our free 5-category scorecard and get a personalized readiness report.

Take the Scorecard
Medusa Japan

Medusa Japan

Medusa Japan is a creative agency and AI product studio based in Osaka, specializing in cross-border business strategy between Japan and global markets.

Related Articles

AIEnterprise

Intelligence Got Cheaper, Money Got Dearer: Three AI Labs Cut Frontier Prices in 48 Hours, Japan's 10-Year Yield Hit a 30-Year High — and How to Re-Run Your AI Business Case for Japan

Last week the AI labs agreed to “pace the frontier.” This week they cut prices. On Monday, September 21, xAI shipped Grok 4.7 at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output. On Tuesday, Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 at $4 and $20, down from $5 and $25, with cache reads 60% cheaper. About ninety minutes later, OpenAI launched GPT-6 Sol at $2 and $10 and GPT-6 Luna at $0.10 and $0.50, half the price of the models they replace. Two days later, on Thursday, September 24, Japan's 10-year government bond yield rose to 3.06%, its highest since August 1996, while the US 10-year passed 5.1%. So intelligence got cheaper in the same week that money got more expensive. It is tempting to treat the price cuts as good news that fixes every AI budget. It does not. Tokens are the part of an AI project that just got cheaper. The build, the integration work and the waiting for payback did not, and a 3% yield makes waiting more expensive. Here is what changed, what a Japanese CFO will now ask, and how to re-run an AI business case before the April budgets are locked.

Market EntryJapan

The Cheapest Door Into Japan Isn't in Tokyo: Yokohama Will Put Up to ¥500 Million Against a Foreign Company's Office — and This Summer's Arrivals Are Walking Through It

Read JETRO's arrivals board for the past six weeks and a pattern appears that nobody announced. ShibuLA Ventures, an American venture studio, opened in Yokohama on August 31. Planar Motor, a Canadian maker of magnetic-levitation transport robots, opened a sales office in Kanagawa on August 5. BrainSpoke, a Thai wearables company, incorporated in Setagaya on July 30. Global Unichip Japan, part of the TSMC group, moved its expanding operation to Yokohama. These are not companies that failed to get into Tokyo. They are companies that ran the arithmetic. Yokohama will offer a foreign firm up to ¥500 million in tax incentives against the lease of a headquarters or R&D base, and up to ¥5 billion toward purchasing or building one; Kanagawa gives 50 business days of free office space and covers half of setup costs up to ¥2 million. Meanwhile the yen sits near ¥157 to the dollar, Japan's inward FDI stock hit a record ¥53.3 trillion, and the government has raised its 2030 target to ¥120 trillion. The subsidy is real, the timing is unusually good, and the catch is real too — a grant pays for a floor, not for customers. Here is what is actually on offer, what it does not buy, and how to decide whether your Japan entry should land outside the capital.